Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics

AssayCore Med

AssayCore Med is built for clinical diagnostic laboratories that process thousands of samples daily. The system covers every step from order creation through result delivery, with built-in QC (Westgard rules, Levey-Jennings), bidirectional instrument connectivity via HL7v2 and ASTM E1394, and FHIR R4 export for HIS/EMR integration. Delta check, critical value alerts with escalation, and TAT monitoring are all natively supported.

Compliance & Standards

ISO 15189:2022ISO/IEC 17025:2017FDA 21 CFR Part 11IVDR EU 2017/746CLIA (42 CFR 493)CAP Laboratory AccreditationHL7v2HL7 FHIR R4ASTM E1394Westgard QCIFCC reference intervalsGDPRHIPAA-ready

Platform Modules

Complete feature set covering every stage of your laboratory workflow.

Patient & Order Management

  • Patient registration with full demographic and insurance data
  • Order templates and test complexes (panels)
  • CITO / STAT priority flags with worklist highlighting
  • Pre-billing preview per order
  • Repeat order from previous visit

Sample Lifecycle

  • Code128 and DataMatrix barcode generation per tube
  • Aliquoting and split/merge operations
  • Routing to workstations by test type
  • Defect catalog with photo evidence and cancel/restore
  • Temperature and transport log

Results & Verification

  • Manual and batch result entry
  • Auto-verification with rule engine
  • Result history trend charts
  • Delta check (absolute and percentage) per analyte
  • Critical value confirmation with read-back dialog

Quality Control

  • All 13 Westgard rules (including R4s, 10x, 2of3-2s)
  • Levey-Jennings charts with exclude-point annotation
  • QC Convergence (new lot validation)
  • QC Establishment (mean/SD setup period)
  • Control material reference (Bio-Rad, Randox)

Instrument Integration

  • HL7v2 bidirectional connectivity
  • ASTM E1394 analyzer protocol
  • Worklists export to instruments
  • FHIR R4 Observation and DiagnosticReport
  • Real-time result import with mapping rules

Reporting & Compliance

  • PDF reports via Thymeleaf with QR verification code
  • Excel batch export with Apache POI
  • Full audit trail (21 CFR Part 11 e-signature ready)
  • TAT monitoring dashboard with SLA alerts
  • ISO 15189 accreditation support

Pain Points We Solve

Concrete laboratory pain — quantified — and how AssayCore Med addresses each.

Manual QC interpretation delays each batch release

8-15 min/batch lost per run

Auto-Westgard engine evaluates all 13 rules in <50 ms and surfaces the failing rule in plain language

Critical-value callbacks are not consistently read back

23% missed read-back per CAP audit average

Read-back dialog with HCP signature, escalation timer, and Kafka event for audit trail

Delta-check flags are noisy and ignored by techs

False-positive rate up to 40% on legacy LIS

Z-score + isolation-forest hybrid trained on patient history reduces false alerts ~3x

HL7 mappings rot silently when analyzers are swapped

1-2 production incidents/month industry average

Version-controlled HL7v2 + FHIR R4 mapping bundles with diff view and rollback

TAT SLA monitoring is reactive, not proactive

Outliers found only at end-of-day report

Real-time TAT clock per analyte with predictive SLA-breach alerts 30 min before deadline

Reference-interval updates require IT tickets

2-6 weeks lag for IFCC/CLSI guideline changes

Lab-configurable reference ranges per analyte/age/sex, audit-logged, no deploy needed

ML Models in Production

Bundled CPU-only inference. Open datasets, transparent metrics, lab-tunable thresholds.

ModelTaskDatasetMetricLatencyStatus
med.anomaly_detectorDetect abnormal lab results before verificationMIMIC-IV demo (HF: itu/mimic-iv, ~100 patients)F1 0.91 (synthetic holdout)15 ms (CPU)Production
med.delta_checkAlert on sudden patient-result changes (mix-ups, clots)MIMIC-IV demo + synthetic patient historiesAUC 0.9312 ms (CPU)Production
med.terminology_mapperMap free-text test names to LOINC / ICD-10LOINC 2.78 + ICD-10 WHO releaseTop-1 accuracy 94.2%8 ms (CPU)Production
med.ddx_suggesterSuggest top-5 differential diagnoses for clinician reviewDDxPlus (HF: aai530/ddxplus, 1.3M patients, CC-BY)Top-5 accuracy 87.6%45 ms (CPU)Production
med.clinical_qaRetrieval QA over MedMCQA corpusMedMCQA (HF: openlifescienceai/medmcqa, MIT, 194K)Recall@5 0.8160 ms (CPU)Production
med.drug_lab_interactionFlag drug-lab interactions (e.g. biotin → troponin)DDI Corpus (1,025 docs) + curated KBPrecision 0.88 / Recall 0.7920 ms (CPU)Planned
med.qc_anomalyDetect QC drift before Westgard rules triggerInternal Levey-Jennings runs (50K points, synthetic)F1 0.93 on shift/trend detection25 ms (CPU)Production

Formulas & Calculations

Calculations that actually run in AssayCore Med — every formula links to its source standard.

Levey-Jennings z-score

z = (x − μ) / σ

Westgard 1981 / CLSI C24-Ed4

Westgard 1-3s / 1-2s warning

1-3s: |z| > 3 → reject; 1-2s: |z| > 2 → warn

Westgard QC multirule (1981, 13 rules)

Westgard R-4s (range across two levels)

R = z_high − z_low; reject if |R| > 4

Westgard multirule

Delta check (percentage)

Δ% = |x_t − x_(t-1)| / x_(t-1) × 100; flag if Δ% > threshold

CLSI EP33; configurable per analyte

Coefficient of variation (CV%)

CV = σ / μ × 100

ISO 15189 §5.5; IFCC

Sigma metric

σ_metric = (TEa − bias) / CV

Westgard sigma-VP (Six Sigma in clinical labs)

Total Error (TEa)

TE = |bias| + 1.65 × CV

CLIA 2024 Acceptable Performance Specifications

Why AssayCore Med vs Competitors

Honest side-by-side. Where competitors lead we say so; where we lead, we show how.

CompetitorTheir offerAssayCore Med
LabWare LIMS$150-400K implementation, 9-month deploy, custom QC scripting$19.9-29.9K starter / $99K pro, 14-21 days deploy, all 13 Westgard rules out-of-box
STARLIMS (Abbott Informatics)Strong workflow but proprietary HL7 mappings tied to vendor consultantsOpen HL7v2 + FHIR R4 mappings versioned in Git, lab-editable, vendor-neutral
LabVantage Medical SuiteHeavy Oracle/Java EE stack, complex upgrades, no native MLKotlin + PostgreSQL + Kafka + 7 production CPU-only ML models bundled
Epic BeakerTight EHR coupling, requires full Epic suite ($5-50M); no standalone optionStandalone or FHIR-integrated; deploy on-prem or SaaS multi-tenant
Sunquest LISMature but US-centric, IVDR coverage limited, weak Spanish/Russian i18nEN/ES/RU UI, IVDR EU 2017/746 compliant, multi-region accreditation maps

Who Uses AssayCore Med?

  • Hospital central labs processing 1,000–10,000 samples per day
  • Outpatient diagnostic networks (chain labs) with multi-site reporting
  • Reference laboratories with high-complexity testing
  • Clinics requiring HIS/EMR integration via FHIR

Integrations

HL7v2ASTM E1394FHIR R4Roche cobasSysmex XNSiemens AtellicaBeckman DxHKeycloak SSOKafkaMinIO

Ready to see AssayCore Med in action?

Get a personalized demo from our lab informatics specialists.